![](/uploads/1/2/7/0/127093647/722921111.jpg)
ToothFairy 2.4.8. Connect AirPods (or other Bluetooth headphones) to your Mac with a single click or keypress. AirPods are great, but they don’t work quite as smoothly with Macs as they do iPhones. The latest version of ToothFairy is 2.5 on Mac Informer. It is a perfect match for Network in the System Tools category. The app is developed by C-Command Software, LLC.
From:Bruce Momjian To:PostgreSQL-announce Subject:ANNOUNCE PostgreSQL Releases: 8.2.4, 8.1.9, 8.0.13, 7.4.17, 7.3.19Date:Mon, 23 Apr 2007 12:22:50 -0400 (EDT)The PostgreSQL Global Development Group has released updated versionsfor PostgreSQL 8.2 and all back versions to patch a privilege escalationexploit in SECURITY DEFINER functions. All users of this feature areurged to update to the latest minor version and follow instructions onsecuring these functions as soon as possible. This minor release alsocontains other fixes, so all users should plan to deploy it.Once you have updated, additional steps are required to secure yourdatabase against the exploit. Please read the release notes atand the TechDocsarticle at on how tolock down your security definer functions, if you use them.Downloads are in the usual places,.As always, application of a minor release does not require a dump andreload of the database.The frequency of security fixes recently is a result of increasedscrutiny of the PostgreSQL code by government agencies andsecurity-conscious companies. Rapid turnaround on security patches iskey to keeping PostgreSQL the most secure SQL database.
Your work andvigilance in applying the latest security updates ensures that therewill never be a PostgreSQL 'worm'.-Bruce Momjian EnterpriseDB+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +-(end of broadcast)-To unsubscribe from this list, send an email to:[email protected]( to post comments).
Posted Apr 23, 2007 21:54 UTC (Mon) by ccyoung (guest, #16340)'Why would you be deeply offended by that?' Maybe by the inference that I'm going to hell for eternity. This added to the morass of other messages such as if I think evolution is true then I'm immoral and I'm contributing to the decay of my nation and I'm even responsible for the shooting at Virgina Tech, etc, etc - which I hear incessantly.you're right, maybe I'm too thin skinned. But as others have said, there's a difference between personal email and that sent under a project's heading.btw, have emailed Bruce on this.
He told me he did not know his email was going out as a pg announcement. Posted Apr 23, 2007 23:05 UTC (Mon) by manls (guest, #15091)Actually, I'm not sure that is a good argument. The magical conversion of mice into Cinderella's horses is a process, but it is false. Or better worded: it cannot happen. Likewise, the evolution of one species into another, or the whole 'all 'specieses' turning into other 'specieses' process might not really happen on Earth.I don't see what other phrases you had in mind?
Scientists agree that species turn into other species, they just are not sure about the actual mechanism. Christian fundamentalists say that god made all species like they are today. I think both positions are quite clear. Posted Apr 26, 2007 7:21 UTC (Thu) by drag (guest, #31333)'I am sorry, you are wrong.
According to the wikipedia, Biblical inerrancy is one of the fundamentals in Christian fundamentalism. This means that the Bible is completely accurate, including the 'historical' and 'scientific' parts. There are other sources for this stuff.'
'I am talking about Bible Inerrancy.NO WERE in the bible does it say that the world was 7 thousand years old.NO WERE in the book of genesis is there any mention of any apple anywere. (even though mistranlatiosn like to stick it in there) Nor does it say anywere that Adam and Eve were the originaters of the human race.Neither was the galaxy created in the beginning book of Genesis.In fact in several places Bible references times that Pre-date the events in the garden of eden.People are told what is in the Bible and they beleive what they are told as gospil.
But what people are told is in the Bible is not realy what is in the bible.Think about what you read about computers and 'internet chat rooms' and technology in common newspapers and mass media. Notice how innacurate it all is? Notice how people just beleive what they are told because they don't know better?Multiply that by a thousand and you get Chistianity. Posted Apr 24, 2007 15:02 UTC (Tue) by i3839 (guest, #31386)On the risk of insulting people, I dare to say: You must be an American.Here in Europe we're apparently much more relax about this. Here religious people acknowledge that a process like evolution exists (because it's silly to deny it), but might have their own ideas about how it all started and have ideas about how it's guided.
Evolution has nothing to do with religion.If I'd be religious I'd be raving proud about the smart ways everything is done, I wouldn't scorn or deny it. Evolution is a very powerful and simple mechanism, which is hard to explain and make clear, because humans can't fathom the scale on which it works (millions of years and billions of subjects). To understand how all life came out of nothing to what it is now you need to understand chemistry (e.g. RNA, amino acids, proteins), probability, the nature of complex systems and the evolution process.Of course it's much more convincing to explain that complex things come from something even more complex and unexplainable, than to explain complex things from simpler elements by which they're caused.But hey, even if it happens that we're all wrong and go to hell, it surely is much more fun there than in heaven.
![Tooth fairy 2 4 8 download full Tooth fairy 2 4 8 download full](http://www.programmersought.com/images/974/4d8d58fc30bb2e04280e2be82a034896.png)
Posted Apr 24, 2007 16:28 UTC (Tue) by i3839 (guest, #31386)Sorry, you're a bit unclear, so I don't know what you're trying to say (partly because I'm not really sure what exact meaning of 'believe' you're using here).First, evolution theory progressed quite a bit since Darwin, as we know a lot more now.Of course it's silly to 'believe' in evolution. Knowing that it exists isn't.
Where and how exactly is a different topic of course.I don't know anything about Easter Bunnies, but either they exist or not. Should be easy to validate. Posted Apr 24, 2007 19:41 UTC (Tue) by khim (subscriber, #9252)It's silly to believe it.Of course. Just like with any scientific theory. You use theory to predict something - and if it predicts things correctly more often then not. It's good enough to use.Darwin observed adaptation, and made the incorrect inference that this predicts evolution.
His entire 'theory' is based on a false premise.100% irrelevant. Even if theory was written by drunken boar who listened to tooth fairy and it has no basis at all but this theory can predict usefull facts - it's good theory and must be regarded as such.Believing in evolution is like believing in the Easter Bunny.How many oil fields were found by using 'Easter Bunny theory'?
How many medicines it gave us? When the answer will be 'as much as evolution theory' - it'll be Ok to compare it with evolution.The fact of the matter: science is not interested in 'absolute truth'. It tries to collect usefull facts and usefull theories - and if one theory (evolition) is simple and predicts a lot of things while another (creationism) is complex and does not predict many usefull facts then it's not even a contest.
When we'll have better theory - this one will be obsolete, but so far I'm yet to see anything better. Posted Apr 24, 2007 14:34 UTC (Tue) by JamesErik (subscriber, #17417)Dion,To explain point (1), I would draw the analogy of someone cured of a terminal illness who tells strangers about how his little-known doctor can cure them, too. In its purest manifestations, Christian evangelization is a labor of love for one's fellow man. Many of those strangers will not believe or will question the teller's motives, as we've seen in this thread and elsewhere in life, but I can assure you that in the great majority of cases I have personally observed, sincerity and love are indeed at the heart of the teller's actions. In my personal experience, authentic, loving, compassionate Christians are a joy to be around.
I hope that one day you have such an experience, as well.JamesErik. Posted Apr 24, 2007 23:34 UTC (Tue) by k8to (guest, #15413)(continuing off topic, sorry)The part where the whole thing becomes perceived as hostile goes like this.- You get told often about the religion other people follow. Strangers, incdental life people, and so on all tell you about their religion.- These people expect you to agree with them and also follow their religion.- Upon learning that you do not follow their religion, a common reaction is indignation, or contempt. Other reactions include compassion, enthusiastic preaching, pity, but many preclude the legitimacy of your path.- Eventually your perception becomes that as a non-follower of religion, you are a minority whom the the majority population looks upon with some variation of marginalization.- End product: people who bring up religion out of the blue are mounting an attack on your worldview, your character, your integrity.I'm not saying this is the way things should work, or that this is reasonable.
I'm just answering your sort of posed question as to how this all works.At least in the United States, the atheists are a sort-of opressed minority. If you look at national level opinion polls, you'll find that atheists are among the least electable groups, more so than women, african-americans, and even open homosexuals. Speaking as a gay atheist, I certainly get into far more trouble as an atheist than as a gay man. It's positively bewildering the low degree of acceptance atheism has, at times.You rightly point out that taking of offense by default is not really productive. It's a kind of perpetuation (and in some cases creation) of marginalization. Be careful of these traps, lest you make life poorer for others and most importantly yourself.
Posted Apr 26, 2007 10:05 UTC (Thu) by grouch (guest, #27289)You're just prejudiced against grey squirrels on posts. Open your eyes, man!
They can have my 7.4.7 when they pry it from my cold, dead hands! Nobody has a need for 8 or more post grey squirrels; that's just evil greed showing through. Can't you see that all these extra squirrels are a thinly veiled attempt to corrupt our precious data flows? These lunatics don't even charge for the squirrels; it's obvious they have a hidden agenda!Oh. Wait a minute.
I guess my 7.4.7 post grey squirrels are going to scamper off and some herd of 8 will get got. Nevermind.But nobody needs a post turtle!!!
![](/uploads/1/2/7/0/127093647/722921111.jpg)